Federal Budget 2010 - a lost opportunity
The Federal Budget has allocated $652 million for a new Renewable Energy Fund, to be paid for from the delay in introducing the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme. This fund will:
1. Make use of private sector investment in order to support renewable energy projects, along with the development and deployment of low emissions technologies.
2. Enhance Australia’s take up of energy efficiency for households and businesses
Another $6 million will be supplied to the Renewable Energy Target scheme which will see it split into two parts: a large scale renewable energy target and small scale renewable energy.
This compares with $2.4 billion set aside in the previous budget in the Clean Energy Initiative for carbon capture and storage.
The actions proposed in the 2010 budget fall well short of leading Australia into a clean energy, low carbon future. As a first step, the Federal and State governments need to develop a plan that will lead to the closure of Hazlewood power station as soon as possible, followed by the phasing out of other carbon producing power stations over the next few years. To do this, they need to focus on what will give the renewable energy industry the confidence to invest in Australia on a large scale. Only part of the solution will lie in supporting developing renewable technologies as there are existing robust renewable technologies. Other answers lie in improving the marketplace for renewable energy technologies (a gross feed-in-tariff, an increased renewable energy target with accompanying renewable energy certificates) and reducing the barriers that make it hard for renewable energy technologies to be connected to the electricity grid.
The delayed implementation of a good carbon taxing scheme, which would have taken aim at Australia’s top 1,000 polluting industries, needs to be offset by a program that puts a clear requirement on those industries to cut down their carbon emissions. Asking householders to become more energy efficient, without having stronger regulations about housing and urban design, will have little impact on our energy emissions but may reduce the pain householders suffer as our energy prices rise as fast and as much as the energy industry predicts.
As an aside, why is it OK to slug a resource tax on the mining industries but not a carbon tax? The first is a short term grab, the latter a genuine opportunity to restructure Australia’s economy to be much more competitive in a carbon constrained world.
If you want to join MASG’s 100% renewable energy campaign (and thanks to the 50 or so people who came to launch this at the Castlemaine Railway Station last Sunday) please call Dean Bridgfoot on 5470 6978.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Aug | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | |||
News Archive
- Document Downloads (1)
- Events (17)
- Low CO2 (1)
- News Digest (143)
- Renewable energy (3)
- Transport (5)
Pages
Links
News by Month
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006

